Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree7Likes
  • 1 Post By mavinry4
  • 1 Post By mavinry4
  • 3 Post By Stoney
  • 2 Post By essiemessy

Thread: Electronic Cigarette Opponent Fails to Discredit New E-Cigarette Clinical

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3,064

    Electronic Cigarette Opponent Fails to Discredit New E-Cigarette Clinical

    Stan Glantz is the American version of Simon Chimpman. To understand these two pathetic individuals ; read my rant here.

    Professor Micheal Siegel tears down Glantz's attempt to discredit the recent Italian clinical study that showed that electronic cigarettes are effective in smoking cessation.

    Click here to read it : The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: Electronic Cigarette Opponent Grasps at Straws to Discredit New E-Cigarette Clinical Trial
    MrGruffy likes this.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Townsville
    Posts
    374
    What an idiot and just think people will believe him. I feel really sorry for those people.

    " who's the more foolish, the fool, or the fool that follows him "

    ok now I'm quoting Obi Wan time for bed I think
    Well at least Vaping has stopped my god awful wheezing

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3,064
    Quote Originally Posted by vreidisgod View Post
    What an idiot and just think people will believe him. I feel really sorry for those people.

    " who's the more foolish, the fool, or the fool that follows him "

    ok now I'm quoting Obi Wan time for bed I think

    Glantz and Chimpman are not fools. They know exactly what they are doing. They are helping to deny smokers a chance for better health, all for the sake of their own interests. They are scum.

    The politicians and colleges who listen to them are the fools.
    arjay55 likes this.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3,064
    And here is Rory Morrison of Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) Scotland criticizing Glantz attempt to discredit the study; TwitLonger — When you talk too much for Twitter

    Here is Chris Snowdon's take on it ; Velvet Glove, Iron Fist: Glantz attempts to debunk e-cigarette study

    And as linked by SAS the other day, here is Dr Farsalinos' take on it ; Efficacy of e-cigarette as a tobacco substitute-a randomized study

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Clagiraba, Queensland
    Posts
    10,965
    oo, i liked this comment on the second link..

    know thy enemy.

    Glantz is not only a neo-prohibitionist, but he’s also protecting his Pharma paymasters. Glantz has long been connected to a funding stream from the Robert Woods Johnson Foundation (Pharma “philanthropy”). RWJF, whose income comes from a large stockholding in Johnson & Johnson – manufacturers of nicotine replacement products, has pumped billions of dollars into funding antismoking activist individuals/groups over the last few decades.

    For those not familiar, Glantz is no “professor of medicine”. He is a mechanical engineer that was given a professorship of medicine by UCSF to lend “medical weight” to his bigoted antismoking ranting and raving. He’s a fraud promoting the logical fallacy of “appeal to authority” along with many of his buddies in Public Health and Tobacco Control.

    According to his online biography, Glantz was awarded a Ph.D. in 1973 from Stanford University in Applied Mechanics and Engineering Economic Systems. From this mechanical background, Glantz undertook a postdoctoral year at Stanford University in Cardiology (1975), and another postdoctoral year at the University of California (San Francisco) in cardiovascular research (1977). It appears that the connection to cardiology is in “applied mechanical” terms; he has no formal training in medicine. In 1977, Glantz was given the academic posting of assistant professor in Cardiology at UCSF; this was upgraded to a full professorship in 1987. Glantz is currently a Professor of Medicine and Director of the Center for Tobacco Control Research & Education at the University of California (San Francisco). It appears that the “medical” status serves essentially to “legitimize” the antitobacco status and exploit Glantz’s high profile in this area.
    http://tobacco.ucsf.edu/users/sglantz
    http://www.nycclash.com/CaseAgainstBans/Appendix.html

    Astounding is that this extremist, neurotic buffoon has been allowed to present himself for the last few decades as a professor of medicine or professor of cardiology. There doesn’t appear to be even one instance where a journalist has asked fundamental questions of Glands – have you had any clinical training in medicine, where did you complete your internship, with which medical board are you certified to practice medicine. The fraud should have been exposed years ago in the MSM along with the Public Health system in Califraudia that bestowed upon him the “professorship”.

    This glorified mechanic and fake medico has even conjured “studies” in economics. His latest WHO-inspired venture is into film censorship, i.e., getting an R-rating for films that contain smoking scenes. The Narcissistic moron knows no bounds: he can fabricate “evidence” in any arena.
    mavinry4, lheamfrg and vreidisgod like this.
    In order of useful: Provari V2 and V1, vamo, eGo twist, Katana v3, Hex, Orion v2, LavaTube, eGo x 6, VMAX, 510N, Tick V2, Tick V1, noEgo 18650, noEgo 14650 , Indulgence x 2, 905 6v mod, KR808D



  6. #6
    AVF Regular
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,301
    LMAO While we're on the topic of names etc. Simian Chimpman, and this 'Glands' - I'd like to see 'Glans'.. knob.

    Anyhoo, back on topic. Unfortunately, just a scroll on your FB newsfeed, if you have non-republican friends in the US who post links or clips, is indicative of just how far minds and mouths like those mentioned above can get into mainstream belief systems. Most notably, fundamentalist redneck republicans and their ilk. My lordy, the twaddle they spout is so scary. No reasonable person I know would agree with that stuff in a million years, and yet, they get elected. Groups like westboro grow and force their hate on the rest of us. Etcetera.
    I'm really fearful of just what these anti-ecig evangelists have behind them in terms of the bloody-mindedness BT/BP supporters can garner in their quests. Similar tactics. All they have to do is bring god or something else into it, and we have a hate campaign on our hands.

    Just my thoughts on all this stuff that keeps popping up.
    mavinry4 and vreidisgod like this.
    Sixth Vape Year and Four Years Sans Durry.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3,064
    If you really want to get a sense of the barrel scraping that Stan Glantz is doing in attempt to discredit this clinical study, read the commentary on his blog

    Italian e-cig study does not support the conclusion that e-cigarettes stimulate smoking cessation | Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education

    Read the posts by "Anonymous". Every post, Anonymous makes Glantz look like a moron.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4
Copyright © 2019 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT +11. The time now is 04:34 AM.