Results 1 to 5 of 5
Like Tree7Likes
  • 6 Post By tugboatofdeath
  • 1 Post By vaping_gal

Thread: More evidence that SHS lung cancer risk was bollox

  1. #1
    AVF Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Sydney (vaping since Nov 2011)
    Posts
    2,144

    More evidence that SHS lung cancer risk was bollox

    I am so not surprised the evidence has always been very dodgy

    Velvet Glove, Iron Fist: New study finds no link between secondhand smoke and lung cancer
    mavinry4, lozza 82, Rose and 3 others like this.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    574
    Quote Originally Posted by tugboatofdeath View Post
    I am so not surprised the evidence has always been very dodgy

    Velvet Glove, Iron Fist: New study finds no link between secondhand smoke and lung cancer
    good find tug. I suspect that the whole second hand smoke theory was basically just justification for not "annoying" non smokers with shs to be honest. non smokers have always complained and hated the smell of smoke (fair enough), but trumping up phony health risks made it more serious and gave it credibility so instead of being "annoying", it was "deadly"
    Rose likes this.

  3. #3
    AVF Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Sydney (vaping since Nov 2011)
    Posts
    2,144
    is all about pushing smokers onto cr@p nrt products to make $$$ and to make more jobs and grants for public health/universities/tobacco control people imho.

    They should have enforced better A/C or ventilation as its pretty cr@p as a non-smoker in a pub.

  4. #4
    AVF Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    733
    Good find. I agree everyone always knew the link was dodgy at best.

    I'm holding my breath for the main stream media to pick this story up and publish it front page in bold type (joke).

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    1,463
    I am waiting for the day when the true numbers of smoking related deaths in the general population are published. Not the ones that count any incidence of lung cancer and heart disease as a smoking related illness, whether the people have been a smoker or not, but the real ones. I think it may surprise all of us.

    It's all such a big scam, isn't it?

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4
Copyright © 2019 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT +11. The time now is 05:26 AM.