Results 1 to 6 of 6
Like Tree17Likes
  • 3 Post By keyboardmama
  • 4 Post By Fatman
  • 6 Post By Old Dog
  • 2 Post By vaping_gal
  • 2 Post By krusty32

Thread: Vaping = Tobacco Harm Reduction (THR)....Or Not?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Melbourne Sth East
    Posts
    1,686

    Vaping = Tobacco Harm Reduction (THR)....Or Not?

    Just reading a FB post and someone brought up the fact that Vaping is NOT TOBACCO and therefore the term THR - Tobacco Harm Reduction should not be used.

    What do you think?

    Should it be called something else and if so what?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    1,463
    It is harm reduction from tobacco products. Hence it makes sense
    Olfella, spud and Donna like this.

  3. #3
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Central Vic,up near the Murray
    Posts
    17,897
    By eliminating the tobacco ... it certainly reduces the threat

    I think its apt , as in substituting vaping for tobacco , it is certainly harm reduction ( from continuing smoking ) however until all the facts are in on vaping , it cannot be said to be a "No Risk" alternative , but a demonstrably ( at this point in time ) safer alternative .

    Bearing that in mind , it is THR ... but one cannot say it is as safe as abstinence .
    If vaping helps you avoid ONE cigarette a day , then it is INDEED Tobacco Harm Reduction
    gtadmin, Olfella, spud and 1 others like this.
    EPM V2-18490 (X2 ),GP Spheroid V2.5 and GP Piccolo V2.5 ,BBCB, Provari mini's, REO mini V2.1, 18490 REO , Jazz Carto Pipes ( fitted with GA tank and churchwarden stem Totally Evil!!! ), Meerschaum pipe ,e-holly35W,Phideas, AIOS,Taifun atties, PC Pipe mods.PC Squonker, Svapiamo squonker, GP Paps Heron combo.

    Vaping since 2007 totally smoke free since 2011


    AVF Rules , Read and understand them

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Melbourne's leafy outer East
    Posts
    3,656
    To be more accurate it should be CHR (cigarette harm reduction), because we know of one tobacco product that provides a lot of harm reduction and has been proven beyond doubt ... snus.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    574
    Quote Originally Posted by Donna View Post
    Just reading a FB post and someone brought up the fact that Vaping is NOT TOBACCO and therefore the term THR - Tobacco Harm Reduction should not be used.
    I think this person doesnt understand the principle of harm reduction. it is about reducing harm from tobacco products and since smokers smoke for the nicotine etc, but dont actually enjoy the smoke part so it's a way of getting what we want (nicotine/habit) from ecigs without the harmful components.
    spud and Donna like this.

  6. #6
    AVF Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    448
    People seriously need education about nicotine..
    As was mentioned in another thread 'mention nicotine the first thought is cigarettes'
    Guilt by association..
    spud and Donna like this.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4
Copyright © 2019 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT +11. The time now is 11:53 AM.