Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
Like Tree15Likes

Thread: QLD: Personal vaporisers should not be regulated under the Tobacco Act

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Tweed Heads
    Posts
    12

    QLD: Personal vaporisers should not be regulated under the Tobacco Act

    I found this on a NZ website, thought I'd share. If it's already posted let me know and I'll remove it.


    STAND UP FOR YOUR VAPING RIGHTS

    Through a ridiculous turn of events QLD is looking at becoming the first state in Australia to subject electronic cigarettes to the same laws as traditional tobaccos due to a report by the WHO which presented false dramatic claims about the adverse effects of harmless vapour from e-cigarette use on public health while there is no scientific evidence to support such a claim.

    Queensland’s State government wants to amend tobacco laws so that electronic cigarettes can only be used in designated areas, cannot be sold to minors, and cannot be advertised or publicly displayed, like regular cigarettes, the Tobacco Act will not ban the devices outright but will subject them to strict restrictions.

    The amendment follows the release of a World Health Organization report last month which claims that there was insufficient evidence that electronic cigarettes help people to quit smoking tobacco, even though there are thousands of ex smokers around the world who found hope on e cigarettes after trying other sort of FDA/TGA Approved Smoking Solutions without any luck.

    The report implied e-cigarette use in youth is a major problem and could be acting as a gateway to smoking, they said, when in fact current use by non-smokers is extremely rare and youth smoking rates are declining.

    The report supported that bystanders can inhale significant levels of toxins from the e cigs vapour, when the reality is that toxins in e cigarette vapour is the same as those present in normal human breath.

    The report gave the impression that evidence suggests e-cigarettes make it more difficult for people to stop smoking, when the opposite is true, the experts said.

    It was also claimed that exposure to nicotine had the potential to affect brain development, liquid nicotine which is used in some electronic cigarettes is already illegal in Queensland, however the claim had not stated whether they were referring to pure 100% nicotine or diluted (under 2%) nicotine e-liquid, which is harmless.

    Lawrence Springborg, Queensland’s Health Minister has introduced the amendment bill into Parliament, with the suggested changes to laws to come into effect from January 1, 2015. “This early, preventative action addresses public health concerns about these products including their use in smoke-free places, the unknown health effects of use and exposure, and potential for a new market of smoking,” Mr. Springborg said in a statement.

    Mr. Springborg said that “evidence regarding the short and long term health effects of direct or second hand inhalation of vapor from electronic cigarettes was still in development.”

    To the vaping community of QLD these new laws are unfair and unjust. It is time for common sense and science to prevail over politics, bulling and intimidation tactics. There is a lot of scientific evidence, coming from health experts, health organizations and scientists which prove the vapour produced from Electronic Cigarettes is harmless, yet the Queensland government has no evidence to prove the opposite and still want to ban its use in public places.

    How can you help? If you are a QLD resident and would like to see these new laws opposed as we do please sign the following petition by clicking the following link and signing your name.

    Current e-petitions - Queensland Parliament

  2. #2
    AVF Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Marrickville NSW
    Posts
    2,949
    Only 38 people have signed the petition?

    imgur: the simple image sharer

  3. #3
    AVF Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    CQ
    Posts
    3,629
    Mmmmm.


    Been posted before if you search for it.


    Probably find one of my wordy rants explaining why I'm not bothered by the proposed legislation.

  4. #4
    AVF Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    1,590
    I thought this was the second petition - I had signed another one that was very similar, im sure of it.
    Terradan likes this.
    Last cigarette: March 14th, 2010 - Started Vaping Feb, 2010.

    "Praise the God of all. Drink the wine. And let the world be the world"

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    5
    I'd have given them my opinion but voting is only for Queensland residents. Sorry folks.

  6. #6
    AVF Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Bingil Bay, QLD
    Posts
    3,313
    Wish there was more of us to fight the power, Most in QLD like the underside of their rocks too much.
    Orph likes this.

  7. #7
    AVF Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Sydney (vaping since Nov 2011)
    Posts
    2,144
    Must be looking after their tobacco/pharma mates

  8. #8
    AVF Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Sydney (vaping since Nov 2011)
    Posts
    2,144
    ...shits me they propose this law even before nic liquid is even legal to sell ffs

  9. #9
    AVF Regular
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Rockhampton
    Posts
    346
    I followed the link for the previous petition but couldn't find it. Have signed this one thou. QLD is such a "nanny" state..

  10. #10
    AVF Regular
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    CQ
    Posts
    3,629
    So what do you all want then? No laws at all? Or just ones with no connection to tobacco?

    I struggle to understand what the problem is with hardware being explicitly legal for sale, possession and use under the proposed legislation, barring use or possession of nic which was already illegal and therefore unchanged. It seems to me this opens the door to revisit the sale and possession of nic, in reasonable strengths and quantities.

    Would you prefer a repeat of the WA debacle and the idiocy that followed?

    Are we raging against the machine simply because it's there to rage against, or have I genuinely missed some aspect of this proposed legislation that's really going to screw everyone?
    Stomp, Fatman, 308hjute and 2 others like this.

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4
Copyright © 2019 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT +11. The time now is 12:35 AM.